* This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting. [ Call to Order Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag Election of Officers] [00:00:02] CALL TO ORDER THE JULY 6TH, 2026 MEETING OF THE BRENTWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION. LET THE RECORD SHOW THAT NINE OF THE 10 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ARE HERE EXCEPT FOR COMMISSIONER TRAVIS. FIRST ITEM IS I WILL HAVE A ROLL CALL AND WE HAVE TWO NEW COMMISSIONERS. WE'D LIKE TO THANK COMMISSIONER OLIVER RETURNS, AND THEN COMMISSIONER EVANS. SO THANK YOU GUYS. UH, WE'LL START OFF WITH THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE LED BY COMMISSIONER LUNDGREN. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE DUE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT, OUR FIRST ITEM OF BUSINESS IS THE ELECTION OF OFFICERS. DO I HAVE A NOMINATION FOR CHAIR? I NOMINATE MICHAEL KAPLAN. I HAVE A NOMINATION FOR MYSELF. SECOND, SECONDED. ARE THERE ANY OTHER NOMINATIONS? ALL THOSE FOUR A AYE. ANY AGAINST AWKWARD? UM, PASSES NINE TO NOTHING. UH, THANK YOU GUYS. APPRECIATE IT. ALL RIGHT. UH, VICE CHAIR. UM, I'D LIKE TO NOMINATE VICE CHAIR BAIN. SECOND. SECOND. WE HAVE A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CROWLEY. ANY OTHER NOMINATIONS? ALL THOSE FOUR A AYE. ANY AGAINST PASSES? NINE TO NOTHING. CONGRATULATIONS. THANK YOU. AND WE ALSO NEED TO ELECT A MEMBER TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY BOARD. DO WE HAVE ANY NOMINATIONS? I NOMINATE RICK LUDON. COMMISSIONER STADNIK. ONE SECOND. UH, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER BAIN. ANY OTHER NOMINATIONS? ALL THOSE FOUR. AYE. ANY AGAINST? UH, CONGRATULATIONS. YOU'RE NOW ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY BOARD. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. OUR [ Approval or Correction of Minutes] FIRST ITEM OF BUSINESS IS THE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FROM OUR JUNE 1ST MEETING. HAS EVERYBODY HAD A CHANCE TO READ 'EM? DO I HAVE A MOTION? I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE THE MINUTES. COMMISSIONER RAND MOVES TO APPROVE. SECOND. SECONDED BY, UM, COMMISSIONER WIESNER. UM, ALL THOSE FOUR. AYE. ANY AGAINST ANY ABSTAIN? ABSTAINED TO ABSTAINED? SO THE MOTION PASSES. 7 0 2 I ABSTAINED AS WELL. OH, THREE PASSES. SORRY. 6 0 3 STILL PASSES. SO, ALL RIGHT, LET'S [ Consent Agenda] GET INTO OUR CONSENT ITEMS. THE CONSENT ITEMS WILL ALL BE READ AS A WHOLE AND VOTED ON US AS A WHOLE. WE WILL BE MOVING CONSENT ITEM THREE AND IT WILL BECOME REGULAR AGENDA ITEM NUMBER ONE. SO WE'LL START OFF WITH, UH, ITEM ONE, FINAL PLOT. ARCADIA SUBDIVISION PHASE TWO ZONING. OSRD. ITEM TWO, ARCADIA SUBDIVISION PHASE THREE, ITEM FOUR, HILLSIDE PROTECTION SITE PLAN REVIEW. HEATHROW HILLS SUBDIVISION LOT 15 ITEM FIVE, MINOR SITE PLAN ALTERATION A DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, AUTO PARK, NASHVILLE. ITEM SIX, REVISED HILLSIDE PROTECTION SITE PLAN. BRENTWOOD HILLS LOT 73. ITEM SEVEN, REVISED FINAL PLOT, RIVER OAKS SUBDIVISION LOT 1 45. ITEM EIGHT. MINOR SITE PLAN ALTERATION. ED LEE'S BARBECUE, BRENTWOOD PLACE EXECUTIVE CENTER. THREE 30 FRANKLIN ROAD ITEM NINE, UH, IN AVAIL ESTATES LOT 21. AND THAT IS OUR EIGHT CONSENT ITEMS. DO I HAVE ON MOTION? I MOVE TO MOVED BY COMMISSIONER STADNIK. DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. SECONDED BY VICE CHAIR BAIN. ALL THOSE FOUR. AYE. AYE. ANY AGAINST PASSES? NINE TO NOTHING. ALL RIGHT, LET'S GET INTO OUR REGULAR [3. BPC2604-004 Revised Preliminary Plan - Arden Woods Subdivision, Zoning OSRD - Applicant: Pape-Dawson, 315 Woodland Street, Nashville, TN 37206] ITEMS. I OKAY. OH YEAH, YOU GUYS CAN LEAVE. I WILL SAY YOU DO A GOOD JOB OF ELECTING PEOPLE. OH, THANK YOU . ALL THE VOTES. GOT IT ALL DONE ONE TIME. I AGREE WITH YOU. WELL DONE. ALL RIGHT. SO BPC 2 4 0 4 DASH 0 0 4. A REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAN. ARDEN WOODS SUBDIVISION ZONING, UH, OSRD. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. EVENING PAPE DAWSON REQUEST APPROVAL OF A REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAN TO SUBDIVIDE THE EXISTING LOT, 12 INTO TWO LOTS. UM, [00:05:01] THE PARCEL CONTAINS 1.57 ACRES. THE ARDEN WOOD SUBDIVISION WAS ORIGINALLY PLATTED IN JULY OF 1997 WITH A TOTAL OF 30 LOTS. CURRENTLY THE SUBDIVISION CONTAINS 29 LOTS AS LOTS 12 AND 13. 12 AND 13. UH, WERE COMBINED IN JULY OF 2003. THIS REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAN PROPOSES TO REESTABLISH THE ORIGINAL LOT 13 AND SUBDIVIDE THIS PARCEL BACK INTO TWO LOTS. UM, AS PART OF THIS PROPOSAL, OUR UH, DETENTION REQUIREMENTS HAVE CHANGED, UH, BACK IN 2003, NO, BACK IN 1997, UH, WE ALLOWED DETENTION TO BE ON PRIVATE LOTS. UM, WE, NO, WE NO LONGER ALLOW THAT. WE REQUIRE DETENTION TO BE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. SO AS PART OF THIS PROPOSAL, UM, PART OF THE NEW LOT IS GONNA BE THE PART THAT'S THE DETENTION AREA NOW IS GONNA BE INCORPORATED INTO COMMON OPEN SPACE. SO, UM, THE PROPOSAL IS TO CREATE A NEW LOT AND THEN A PORTION OF THAT NEW LOT, WHICH IS IN, IS AN EXISTING DETENTION POND WILL BECOME COMMON OPEN SPACE. UM, WE HAVE 15 CONDITIONS STANDARD REQUIREMENTS OF, OF APPROVAL AND WE ARE RECOMMENDING THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION FORWARD A RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE REVISED PRE PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STAFF REPORT. OKAY. WE'LL GO WITH COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS AND THEN WE'LL GO WITH CITIZEN QUESTIONS. IS THAT AND YOU ALSO HAVE AN APPLICANT? OH, AN APPLICANT. UM, WE JOIN US UP FRONT. I THINK WE KNOW YOU. GOOD EVENING EVERYONE. GOOD EVENING TO SEE YOU AGAIN. JEFF. JEFF DOBSON TAPE DAWSON, ENGINEERS THREE 15 FUL STREET NASHVILLE. NO PROBLEMS WITH THE CON CONDITIONS OF APPROVALS. STANDARD REQUIREMENTS. OKAY. COMMISSIONERS, DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? WE'LL START DOWN HERE. COMMISSIONER LRE? NO, CROWLEY RAND BAIN? NONE PLEASE? NO. OKAY. UM, WE DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. DO WE HAVE ANY CITIZENS THAT HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS PLEASE. MY NAME IS TODD RAVEN. I'M, I LIVE AT 6 3 9 3 CHARTWELL COURT OR LOT 15 ON THIS MAP. AND I'M RESPECTFULLY ASKING THIS ITEM BE REMOVED AND AT LEAST DISCUSSED AND DEFERRED UNTIL THERE'S ENOUGH ENGINEERING AND PLANNING INFORMATION FOR EVERYONE TO UNDERSTAND HOW THIS REVISED LOT CAN BE REALISTICALLY BE DEVELOPED AND WHAT IMPACT THE DEVELOPMENT COULD HAVE ON DRAINAGE. UM, I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS PROPOSAL'S BEING DESCRIBED AS RESTORING THE SUBDIVISION BACK TO THE ORIGINAL 30 LOTS. BUT A LOT HAS CHANGED SINCE THAT ORIGINAL SUBDIVISION WAS APPROVED. LOTS. 12 AND 13 WERE COMBINED YEARS AGO. SINCE THEN, A HOME, A SWIMMING POOL AND SUBSTANTIAL HARDSCAPE HAS BEEN ADDED TO LOT 13. AND THE BOUNDARY WITH MY PROPERTY WAS LATER ADJUSTED THIS PROPOSAL BEFORE YOU ALSO CREATES A DIFFERENT LOCK CONFIGURATION THAN WHEN IT WAS ORIGINALLY EXISTED BECAUSE PART OF THAT FORMER LAW IS NOW PERMANENT OPEN SPACE FOR THE DETENTION AREA. ONE OF THE BIGGEST CONCERNS FOR ME IS STORM WATER DURING HEAVY RANGE WATER ALREADY GETS VERY HIGH IN THIS AREA AND I HAVE VIDEO SHOWING THE EXISTING CONDITIONS. I'D BE HAPPY TO SHARE 'EM WITH YOU ALL. I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS IS A TRANSITIONAL LOT AND I ALSO UNDERSTAND THERE'LL BE AN ENGINEERING REVIEW BEFORE A HOME CAN BE BUILT. I'M NOT AN ENGINEER. UM, BUT WHAT, AND THAT'S EXACTLY WHY I'M ASKING FOR ENOUGH ENGINEERING AND PLANNING INFORMATION BEFORE THIS LOT IS APPROVED. IT SEEMS TO ME THAT THE ORIGINAL ENGINEERING ASSUMPTIONS FROM 1997 WOULD NOT HAVE INCLUDED THE HOUSE, THE POOL AND HARDSCAPE THAT NOW EXIST ON LOT 12. I DON'T KNOW WHETHER THESE CHANGES HAVE BEEN EVALUATED TOGETHER WITH THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS REVISED LOT. 13. BUT I THINK IT'S AN IMPORTANT QUESTION TO ANSWER BEFORE APPROVING A NEW LOT. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT THE HOA HAS APPROVED THE LOT SPLIT, BUT MY UNDERSTANDING IS THE HOA HAS NOT REVIEWED THE HOUSE PLANS 'CAUSE THEY HAVEN'T BEEN SUBMITTED. SO TODAY, MORE SO TODAY, NONE OF US KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THE ACTUAL HOME DRIVEWAY OR IMPERVIOUS SURFACE WILL LOOK LIKE. I'M NOT ASKING YOU GUYS TO DENY THE APPLICATION. I'M SIMPLY ASKING THAT BEFORE APPROVING THIS REVISED LOT THAT THERE BE ENOUGH INFORMATION TO DEMONSTRATE THAT CAN BE DEVELOPED IN A WAY THAT PROTECTS THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES AND DOES NOT CREATE ADDITIONAL STORM WATER CONCERNS. I THINK HAVING THAT INFORMATION ON THE HEAD SAVES A LOT OF TROUBLE IN THE END. PERFECT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. UM, TODD, DO WE HAVE ANY, DO YOU GUYS HAVE ANY COMMENTS? YEAH, SURE. I MEAN, WELL I'LL, I'LL START, BUT I MAY HAVE TO GET DEREK OR JASON TO TALK ABOUT THE ENGINEERING ASPECTS OF THE PROPERTY. BUT WE ARE REQUIRING THAT THE LOT BE DESIGNATED TRANSITIONAL AND THAT'S ONE THE MAIN REASON IS SO WHEN [00:10:01] A BUILDING PERMIT IS APPLIED FOR AND IMPROVEMENTS ARE PROPOSED ON THE LOT, OUR ENGINEERING STAFF CAN REVIEW AND MAKE SURE THAT THE WATER GETS INTO THE POND, RIGHT? SO, UM, WE'RE, WE'RE FULLY PREPARED, UH, TO REVIEW A, A REQUEST FOR A HOUSE OR ANY OTHER IMPROVEMENTS. AND WE, WE WILL MAKE SURE THAT THOSE IMPROVEMENTS MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF OUR CODES. UM, THIS IS THE FIRST STEP IN THE PROCESS TO CREATE THE LOT. UM, SO I DON'T KNOW IF DEREK HAS ANYTHING TO ADD. UM, I ALWAYS HAVE SOMETHING TO ADD. UH, TODD, UH, GREAT JOB OF EXPLAINING ALL OF THAT. AND, UH, JEFF, YOU AS WELL, UH, THE, UH, CITIZEN HAS SOME GOOD QUESTIONS THERE. THEY'RE VALID QUESTIONS. UH, HOWEVER, IN THIS CASE, THE, UH, WE GO BY THE CURRENT REQUIREMENTS, TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAN. UH, THIS PLAN MEETS THOSE REQUIREMENTS, UH, AND THAT'S WHY WE, UH, HAVE ADVISED, UH, COMMISSION, UH, OF OUR ACCEPTANCE OF THAT. AND, AND, UH, WE, UM, WE'RE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAN. UH, NOW REGARDING SOME HISTORY FOR THIS LOT, UH, I I DID WANT TO ADD A COUPLE OF THINGS. SO AS WAS MENTIONED, THE LOT WAS THESE, THE, THE PLAT WAS INITIALLY SH SHOWED THESE TWO LOTS, UH, AND THEN THESE TWO LOTS WERE COMBINED AS ONE LOT. NOW THIS NEW CONFIGURATION ADDING ANOTHER LOT AND SPLITTING ACTUALLY REDUCES THE BUILDING ENVELOPE AND THE AMOUNT OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE THAT CAN BE BUILT ON THESE TWO LOTS. WHEN COMPARED TO THE IMMEDIATELY PRIOR ONE LOT, THE ONE COMBINED LOT, UH, THE CITIZEN MENTIONED THAT THERE WERE, UH, FACILITIES THERE. I THINK HE SAID ON LOT 13, I BELIEVE. AND I HOPE HE MEANT LOT 12 BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE THE EXISTING FACILITIES ARE. UM, SO IN REGARDS TO OVERALL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE THAT CAN BE BUILT ON THESE TWO LOTS, IT'S ACTUALLY A BIT LESS NOW THAN IT WAS PRIOR, UH, TO THE SPLIT. AND UH, THE OPEN SPACE DETENTION AREA WILL NOW BE REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOA. UH, SO WE HAVE A LITTLE BIT MORE ENFORCEMENT GOING ON THERE RATHER THAN JUST FOR A SINGLE PROPERTY OWNER. AND, UM, AS ALSO HAS BEEN MENTIONED, WE HAVE REQUIRED THESE LOTS BE REVIEWED AS TRANSITIONAL LOTS SO THAT WE CAN ASSURE THAT THE DRAINAGE FROM LOT 12 AND 13 AND IN FACT LOTS 14 AND 15 ARE THAT, THAT THAT RUNOFF IS DIRECTED TO THE DETENTION POND AND THAT IT'S TAKEN CARE OF THERE. SO AGAIN, THIS PLAN MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAN GRADING AND DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS WILL BE REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE. AND UH, THAT'S WHERE WE'RE AT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. UH, JEFF, DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS? WELL, NO, NOT REALLY, BUT I WILL POINT OUT TO YOU THAT THERE WAS A COMMENT ABOUT THE ADDITIONAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ON LOT 12. YOU CAN SEE THAT ALL OF THE, UH, IMPROVEMENTS ON LOT 12 ARE WITHIN THE BUILDING ENVELOPE. OKAY. THAT'S ESSENTIALLY IT. OKAY, THANK YOU. UM, ANY COMMENTS OR ANY COMMENTS, QUESTIONS? ANYBODY COMMENTS? QUESTIONS? I GUESS QUESTION FOR THE CITY, IF, IF THERE'S NOT A, UH, A BUILDING APPLICATION THAT IS CONFORMING WITH STORM WATER, ET CETERA, DOES IT, WOULD THE APPLICANT THEN COME BACK TO POTENTIALLY TRY TO MOVE IT BACK TO A SINGLE, UH, A SINGLE LOT INSTEAD OF TWO? OR WHAT WOULD THAT PROCESS LOOK LIKE? I, I WOULD IMAGINE THEY WOULD REDUCE THE SCOPE OF THE WORK, RIGHT? THEY WOULD REDUCE THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT OR MAYBE NOT DO A SWIMMING POOL OR OTHER IMPROVEMENTS TO MAKE THE NEW LOT WORK. UH, WE WON'T ISSUE ANY PERMITS UNTIL IT WORKS AND MEETS OUR REQUIREMENTS. SO HOW MANY MORE TIMES DOES THIS, UM, GONNA HAVE TO COME IN FRONT OF YOU GUYS FOR APPROVAL BEFORE A HOUSE ACTUALLY IS ABLE TO BE BUILT THERE OR ANY IMPROVEMENTS TO LOT 13 ARE ABLE TO BE MADE? WELL THE NEXT STEP IS, UM, YOUR RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY COMMISSION FOR THE UH, OSRD DEVELOPMENT PLAN. THE REVISION. OKAY. SO, UH, THIS WILL GO TO THE CITY COMMISSION AND THEN UM, THE APPLICANT WILL COME BACK WITH A REVISED PLAT THAT WILL BE BEFORE THIS BOARD. UH, ONCE THE FINAL [00:15:01] PLAT IS APPROVED, UM, THEN THEY'LL GET SIGNATURES AND IT CAN GET RECORDED AND THEN, THEN AT THAT POINT THEY WILL APPLY FOR BUILDING PERMIT. OKAY. OKAY. SO IT'S JUST SORT OF A FOLLOW UP. OUR, OUR APPROVING, THIS DOES NOT CONFER THE RIGHT TO DEFINITELY BE ABLE TO BUILD SOMETHING ON IT. THAT ALL COMES WHEN WE START LOOKING AT THE TECHNICAL ASPECTS OF THE PROPERTY AND WHAT IS PROPOSED. RIGHT. THIS BOARD IS A YEAH, YOU'RE, THAT HELPS A LITTLE. YOU'RE APPROVING AN ADDITIONAL LOT. OKAY. BUT NOT A CONVEYING A RIGHT TO DEFINITELY BUILD SOMETHING. NO, TOTALLY. THAT'S NON LEGALESE THERE. BUT YOU FOLLOW THE YES. YEAH, EXACTLY. TODD, AM I RIGHT? THE SUBDIVISION IS ONLY PERMISSIBLE 'CAUSE IT'S OSRD ZONING. OTHERWISE THE LOTS WOULD BE TOO SMALL FOR ANY OF THE OTHER RESIDENTIAL ZONING. UH, CORRECT. UM, BUT IT DOES MEET THE OSRD REQUIREMENTS. YEAH. THANK YOU. OKAY. DO I HAVE A MOTION? MOTION TO APPROVE? MOVE TO APPROVE. DO I HAVE A SECOND MOVE BY COMMISSIONER OLIVER? DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND IT. UM, SO NOW DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION COMMISSIONER. I'M OKAY WITH IT. YEAH, I I MEAN IT, IT'D BE PREMATURE TO HAVE A HOUSE PLAN AT THIS POINT, SO WE'VE GOTTA START THE PROCESS, UM, IN ORDER TO GET THE DETAILS TO ACTUALLY SEE WHAT THE ENGINEERS NEED TO LOOK AT FOR THE WATER. SO, UM, I, I'M FOR IT. I, I DON'T SEE ANY GROUNDS THAT WE HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO NOT APPROVE THIS. YEAH, IT SEEMS LIKE THE 15 STANDARD CONDITIONS REQUIRED BY THE CITY, INCLUDING NUMBER 11, WHICH ADDRESSES STORMWATER SHOULD ADDRESS THIS ISSUE. I WOULD THINK. YEAH. ONCE AGAIN, I'D LIKE TO THANK THE CITY. YOU GUYS DO A GREAT JOB OF DEALING WITH THESE AND MAKING SURE, AND YOU KNOW, AS FAR AS OUR BOARD GOES, MOST EVERYTHING IS IN BLACK AND WHITE FOR US. WE DON'T HAVE A LOT OF GRAY AREA, UNLIKE THE CITY COMMISSION. SO, ALRIGHT, I'LL CALL FOR A VOTE. ALL THOSE FOUR. AYE, ANY AGAINST PASSES? NINE TO NOTHING. SO THANK YOU. ALRIGHT, WE'LL GO [1. Ordinance 2026-05 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 78, DIVISIONS 3 REGARDING ZONING] ON TO REGULAR. UH, AGENDA ITEM NUMBER TWO, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE CHAPTER 78 DIVISIONS. THREE REGARDING ZONING. THE CITY IS THE APPLICANT. YEP. THANK YOU. UH, ORDINANCE 2026 DASH ZERO FIVE UM, IS, IS AN ORDINANCE REVISION TO ESTABLISH A MINIMUM 40% GREEN SPACE REQUIREMENT FOR THE AR AGRICULTURAL RESIDENTIAL ESTATE. R ONE LARGE RESIDENTIAL AND R TWO SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS. UM, THIS 40% GREEN SPACE REQUIREMENT IS IDENTICAL TO WHAT WE CURRENTLY REQUIRE FOR OUR OSRD ZONING DISTRICT. UM, THIS PROPOSAL IS IN CONJUNCTION WITH SOME STORM WATER AND WATER QUALITY REVISIONS THAT WERE BROUGHT FORTH BY OUR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, WHICH ARE GOING THROUGH THE CITY FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL, WHICH AFFECT CHAPTER 56 OF OUR ZONING ORDINANCE. UM, AS PART OF THAT EXERCISE, UM, WE FELT THAT IT WOULD BE A GOOD IDEA TO GO AHEAD AND INCORPORATE THE GREEN, MINIMUM GREEN SPACE REQUIREMENT OF 40% TO OR WITHIN OUR ADDITIONAL OTHER ZONING, UM, RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS. SO THAT'S WHAT'S BEFORE YOU TONIGHT IS JUST MAKING THE 40% GREEN SPACE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT, WHICH IS REQUIRED NO SRD, WE'RE MAKING THAT APPLICABLE TO OUR OTHER THREE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS. UM, SO THIS WENT TO FIRST READING BEFORE THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ON JUNE 8TH. THE NEXT UH, SCHEDULED MEETING IS BEFORE THE CITY COMMISSION. IT'S A PUBLIC HEARING ON JULY 13TH. AND THEN, UH, SECOND AND FINAL READING IS SCHEDULED FOR JULY 27TH. PERFECT. ALL RIGHT, START DOWN HERE. DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE CITY? NO. NO QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS? DO I HAVE A MOTION TO, UH, RECOMMEND AN APPROVAL TO THE CITY COMMISSION SHALL MOVE. MOVED BY VICE CHAIR BAIN, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CROWLEY. ALL THOSE FOUR AYE AYE. ANY AGAINST? WE WILL BE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COMMISSIONERS. AND NOW LET'S GO INTO OUR MONTHLY [1. Monthly Security Report - June 2026] SECURITY REPORT. IT'S A BAD ONE. I HEARD. SO FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE, WE HAVE NO CHANGE IN OUR SECURITY REPORT. UM, THERE WE CURRENTLY HAVE $18,569,357 AND 22 CENTS. AND WE ASK THAT YOU APPROVE THE MONTHLY SECURITY REPORT AS PUBLISHED IN YOUR PACKET. DO I HAVE A MOTION? I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE COMMISSIONER [00:20:01] RAND. SECOND. SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER EVANS. ALL THOSE FOUR. AYE. ANY AGAINST? NINE ZERO. ALL RIGHT, LET'S GO INTO [2. Board and Commission Reports] BOARD AND COMMISSION REPORTS. UM, DO YOU THINK NOTHING. UH, WE HAD A GOOD JULY 4TH AND HAD THE FIFE AND DRUM OUT THERE FOR THE HISTORIC COMMISSION AND THEY KICKED THINGS OFF WITH THAT AND A, A MUSKET SALUTE, UH, TO START THE FESTIVITIES AT SEVEN O'CLOCK AND IT WAS A GOOD DAY FOR EVERYBODY. SO I'LL SAY THE 4TH OF JULY. UH, FIREWORKS ARE REALLY, REALLY GREAT THIS YEAR, SO KUDOS TO THE CITY. THEY DID A WONDERFUL JOB. LOT OF PEOPLE OUT THERE SEEMED A LOT BIGGER THAN USUAL. MR. STA ENVIRONMENT BOARD PARTICIPATED IN REFILL, REDUCE, AND REUSE PLEASE. UM, AT THE THIRD CONCERT AT CROCKETT PARK, WE BROUGHT BIG VATS OF WATER FOR ANYONE WHO HAD A BOTTLE AND GAVE OUT STICKERS. AND WE GOT RID OF ALMOST BOTH THINGS OF WATER. SO IT WAS TERRIFIC. UM, TREE BOARD, UH, WE CELEBRATED THE 250 YEARS AS YOU SAW IN HERE. WE GAVE A TREE TO THE WINDY HILL PARK. HOWEVER, YOU ALL NEED TO KNOW A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT THIS TREE. IT WAS VERY SPECIAL. UM, THERE IS AN ORGANIZATION CALLED THE AMERICAN HERITAGE HISTORICAL TREES, AND THEY COMBINE HISTORY ALONG WITH CONSERVATION. SO THEY HAVE TREES FROM OUR US PRESIDENTS, FROM WRITERS, FROM, UM, IMPORTANT FIGURES THROUGHOUT OUR NATION'S HISTORY. AND THEY TOOK SEEDS FROM THESE TREES AND THEN PROPAGATED THEM. SO OUR TREE IS A WHITE OAK AND IT IS FROM FAULKNERS ROWAN OAK PROPERTY, AND THAT CAME FROM A 200 YEAR OLD WHITE OAK ON HIS PROPERTY. SO IT'S A SIGNIFICANT TREE. THE OTHER IMPORTANCE OF IT, WE WANTED A WHITE OAK BECAUSE WHITE OAK TREES IN TENNESSEE ARE BECOMING RARE AND THERE ARE INITIATIVES TO GATHER THE ACORNS THROUGH UT AND VANDERBILT AND SO ON IN THE FALL AND TRY TO PROPAGATE THEM THROUGHOUT OUR STATE. BUT THE OTHER IMPORTANT THING ABOUT A WHITE OAK IS OUT OF ALL THE TREE SPECIES, THE WHITE OAK IS THE TREE THAT SUPPORTS THE MOST ANIMALS AND ECOLOGY. SO LIKE 300 TYPES OF SPECIES GAIN FOOD AND, AND EVERYTHING FROM THE WHITE OAK. SO I WANTED YOU TO KNOW THAT PERFECT. IS THAT PARTNER'S PROPERTY IN MISSISSIPPI OR WHERE IS IT? UM, YES, IT IS, IT IS HIS HOME AND UM, IT'S CALLED, ITS HOME IS CALLED ROWAN OAK FROM A ROWAN OAK TREE HISTORIC TREE, BUT THAT'S NOT THE SAME AS THE WHITE OAK TREE. PERFECT. ANY OTHER REPORTS OR ANYTHING? DO WE HAVE ANYTHING ELSE? WELCOME TO THE TWO NEW COMMISSIONERS. THANK YOU. AND UM, I WILL ADJOURN. THANK YOU. * This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting.