[00:00:01]
EVENING.I'D LIKE TO WELCOME ALL TO THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BRENTWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION FOR MONDAY, NOVEMBER 6TH, 2023.
THIS EVENING, WE HAVE COMMISSIONER CROWLEY AND COMMISSIONER LUNDGREN THAT ARE ABSENT.
ALL OTHER COMMISSIONERS ARE PRESENT.
IF WE COULD PLEASE STAND FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE LED BY COMMISSIONER STA I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE ALL TO THE FLAG, THE FLAG OF THE UNITED, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
ALL OF THE ITEMS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA WILL BE READ AS ONE UNIT AND VOTED ON TOGETHER.
IF THERE IS ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE OR ANYONE HERE ON THE COMMISSION THAT WOULD LIKE TO MOVE AN ITEM TO THE REGULAR AGENDA SO THAT IT CAN BE DISCUSSED, PLEASE LET ME KNOW NOW.
WE'LL KEEP THE CONSENT AGENDA AS IT IS THEN.
MOVING ON TO THE CONSENT AGENDA.
[1. October 2, 2023]
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FROM THE OCTOBER 2ND, 2023 MEETING.ARE THERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS? NOPE.
DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENTED? UH, I'M SORRY, THE MEETING MINUTES.
WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER CHURCH FOR APPROVING.
SECOND, SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER KAPLAN.
THE OCTOBER 2ND, 2023 MINUTES ARE ACCEPTED AS PRESENTED.
[ Consent Agenda]
CONSENT AGENDA.ITEM NUMBER ONE BPC 2305 DASH 0 0 1.
THE REVISED HILLSIDE PROTECTION SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR TERRA MOORE SUBDIVISION PHASE 10 LOT 1 96, 95 21 NOTTAWAY LANE ZONING.
ITEM NUMBER TWO BPC 23 1 DASH ZERO ONE A PARKING STUDY FOR SUTHERLAND PLACE MARYLAND FARMS, SECTION 51 LOT 59 200 WINTERS CIRCLE S ZONING C ONE ITEM NUMBER THREE BPC 23 1 0 0 2.
A LIMITED DURATION EVENT FOR SANTA'S TREES AT THE HG HILL CENTER.
2 89 FRANKLIN ROAD ZONING C TWO.
DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA? MOVE TO APPROVE.
WE HAVE MOTION TO APPROVE FROM COMMISSIONER TRAVIS.
WE HAVE A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER PIPPEN.
THE CONSENT AGENDA IS APPROVED AS PRESENTED, AND IF YOU WERE JUST HERE FOR THE CONSENT AGENDA, FEEL FREE.
[1. BPC2310-005 Master Plan - Brentwood United Methodist, Zoning SI-1 - Applicant: Ragan Smith Associates]
OKAY.MOVING ON TO THE REGULAR AGENDA, B PC 2310 DASH ZERO FIVE.
THE MASTER PLAN, BRENTWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH ZONING SI ONE.
UM, REAGAN SMITH AND ASSOCIATES REQUESTS APPROVAL OF A MASTER PLAN FOR THE BRENTWOOD UNITED METHODIST METH METHODIST CHURCH.
THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED MASTER PLAN FROM 2019 PROPOSED A BUILDING EDITION OF 26,400 SQUARE FEET.
THAT WOULD TAKE UP A LARGE AREA OF THE EXISTING PARKING IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE THE, THIS ADDITION, A A NEW PARKING AREA CONSISTING OF 184 PARKING SPACES WAS PROPOSED TO THE WEST AND ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STREAM IN THE FLOODPLAIN.
UM, IF YOU CAN KIND OF SEE THE PREVIOUS PLAN, UH, THE CHURCHES IN THE BUILDINGS ARE IN THIS AREA AND THEY WERE PROPOSING PARKING TO THE WEST OVER HERE.
UM, THIS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED MASTER PLAN HAS SINCE EXPIRED.
THE CURRENT MASTER PLAN PROPOSAL SHOWS SMALLER ADDITIONS TOTALING 10,629 SQUARE FEET WITH THESE SMALLER ADDITIONS.
NO SUBSTANTIAL ADDITION OF PARKING IS NEEDED OR IS BEING PROPOSED.
ONE ACCESS TO WILLIAMSBURG ROAD IS BEING ELIMINATED.
UH, 10 ONSITE PARKING SPACES ARE PROPOSED.
UH, IN ADDITION, UH, THE, A NET GAIN OF 10 PARKING SPACES IS BEING PROPOSED, AND YOU CAN SEE IT IN THIS AREA HERE.
UM, THE FUTURE RESERVE PARKING OF 152 SPACES ON THE CLEMENT PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH IS STILL INCLUDED IN THIS MASTER PLAN IS AND IS INCORPORATED INTO THE PARKING CALCULATIONS AS WAS PREVIOUSLY PROPOSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
THIS PARKING WILL NOT BE BUILT UNTIL THE CITY FINDS IT NECESSARY.
THE CURRENT MASTER PLAN REDUCES THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE BY 15,771 SQUARE FEET AND REDUCES THE TOTAL ONSITE PARKING, UM, BY 178 SPACES.
THERE ARE FIVE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.
THE FIRST CONDITION IS THAT THE CURRENT
[00:05:01]
STORM WATER AND DETENTION REQUIREMENTS WILL BE, UH, REQUIRED WITH THIS, UH, WITH ANY FUTURE SITE PLAN SUBMITTALS.NUMBER TWO, STORM WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY MEASURES WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE ADDITIONAL PARKING LOT ON THE RESERVE PARCEL AND WILL NEED TO MEET CITY OF BRENTWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE REQUIREMENTS.
NUMBER THREE, PROVIDE THE, THEY'LL NEED TO PROVIDE THE FLOW LINE OF THE CREEK AND, UH, TOP OF BANK TO VERIFY THE STREAM BUFFER.
NUMBER FOUR, A FLOODWAY WILL NEED TO BE ESTABLISHED FOR ALL PROPOSED NEW DEVELOPMENT NEAR THE STREAM.
THE STORMWATER AND FLOODPLAIN REQUIREMENTS IN CHAPTER 56 OF THE CODE WILL BE REQUIRED.
AND NUMBER FIVE, ARTER ARTERIAL ROAD BUFFER PLANTINGS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE NEW, UH, PARKING PROPOSED ALONG FRANKLIN ROAD ON THE SOUTH.
UH, A COMPLIANT BUFFER PLANTING PLAN WILL NEED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH ANY FUTURE SITE PLAN REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT THIS PARKING.
AND WITH THAT STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT THIS REQUEST, UM, THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION VOTE TO APPROVE THIS REQUEST WITH, OF THE PROPOSED MASTER PLAN SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STAFF REPORT.
AND I THINK WE HAD ONE SORT OF PLAN IN THERE THAT WITH A, A LITTLE MORE CLOSEUP THAT SHOWS WHERE THINGS ARE.
SO YOU CAN SEE IT A LITTLE BIT BETTER HERE.
THE, THE PARKING, UM, SORT OF RECONFIGURATION IS IN THIS AREA.
ONE SMALL ADDITION IS RIGHT HERE.
ANOTHER ADDITION IS RIGHT HERE.
AND THIS, WITH THIS PARKING, IT ELIMINATES ONE OF THE EXISTING DRIVEWAYS TO WILLIAMSBURG ROAD.
AND AS YOU CAN SEE, THE, THE PROPOSING, THE, THE PARKING THAT WAS PROPOSED ON THE WEST SIDE IS NO LONGER NEEDED.
AND I BELIEVE THE APPLICANT IS HERE AS WELL TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
I THINK IF THE APPLICANT WOULD LIKE TO COME UP AND INTRODUCE YOURSELF AND, AND YOUR ADDRESS.
AND THEN, UH, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD? UH, YES.
UH, ADDRESS IS THREE 15 WOODLAND STREET IN NASHVILLE.
UH, I JUST DO WANT TO CLARIFY THAT THE, UH, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ARE FOR THE, UH, FUTURE PARKING ON THE CLEMENT PROPERTY.
IS THAT CORRECT? SAY THAT AGAIN.
THAT THE CONDITIONS TWO THROUGH FIVE APPLY TO THE CLEMENT PROPERTY ONLY.
UM, THEY, THEY PRIMARILY APPLY TO THAT PROPERTY, BUT I, I'LL HAVE TO ASK DERRICK ON, ON WHETHER THE OTHER STORM WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY, QUANTITY MEASURES AND STORM WATER REQUIREMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE NORTH SIDE.
I, I BELIEVE IT APPLIED TO THE WHOLE PLAN, BUT DEREK CAN CLARIFY.
THE, UH, I THINK ITEM ONE MENTIONS, UM, ITEMS TWO THROUGH FIVE, I THINK THAT YOU MENTIONED.
THAT IS FOR THE NEW PARKING LOT THAT IS PROPOSED IN THE FUTURE.
IF I RECALL WHAT HAPPENED HERE, THE, UH, PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA WAS EITHER NO MORE OR NOT SIGNIFICANTLY MORE THAN THAT, WHICH EXISTS NOW.
SO THERE WAS NO CHANGES TO THE STORMWATER DETENTION REQUIRED.
THAT, THAT THAT IS CORRECT FOR THE WESTERN PORTION, THE EASTERN PORTION, THE SMALLER EDITION DOES HAVE PAVERS TO SUPPORT THE DETENTION.
SO I THINK THAT ADDRESSES NUMBER ONE OF THE CONDITIONS.
THANK, DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONER CHURCH? YEAH, I HAVE A QUESTION, JUST A CONSIDERATION.
GO TO THE LOWER LOT THAT THAT'S ON THE CLAIMANT PROPERTY.
IF YOU COULD PUT THAT PICTURE UP PLEASE.
UM, YOU KNOW, I WAS ON THE COMMISSION IN 2019.
THIS WAS A VERY CONTROVERSIAL ISSUE ABOUT, UH, THE, THE, THE, THE WATER DRAINING AND, AND, AND PUTTING THE PARKING LOT ON THE, ON THE, UH, MORE TOWARD THE RESIDENTIAL SIDE.
WOULD THERE BE, AND, AND I'M ASKING THE CITY THIS, AND I'M ASKING REAGAN SMITH THIS, UM, IF YOU'LL NOTE, OH, YOU CAN'T REALLY SEE IT ON THIS PICTURE, BUT, UM, UH, I GUESS THE C ONE OR SSSI ONE, IS THAT WHAT IT IS? SI ONE? YES.
SI ONE, UM, REQUIRES THIS, UH, THIS A HUNDRED FOOT BUFFER RIGHT HERE.
WOULD, WOULD IT NOT MAKE MORE SENSE TO ME AND TO ANYONE ELSE IF A REQUEST TO VARIANCE THAT ORDINANCE OF THE A HUNDRED FOOT BUFFER FROM HERE LIKE THE BANK HAS, AND LIKE ALL OF THE, THE BUSINESSES HAVE NORTH OF HERE, AND NOT PUT THAT THERE, BUT PUT THAT HERE AND KEEP THAT CLOSER TO FRANKLIN ROAD AS OPPOSED TO MOVING IT FURTHER BACK INTO THE, TO, TO THE, UH, UH, SUBDIVISION IF IT'S EVER COMES TO, TO PASS.
WELL, THIS WILL, THIS WOULD HAVE TO COME BACK BEFORE THE, THE COMMISSION SHOULD THIS SITE PLAN EVER BE PROPOSED FOR CONSTRUCTION.
[00:10:01]
MEAN, I JUST, I'M JUST THINKING, YOU KNOW, THE LEAST, UM, DETRIMENTAL TO THE MEADOW LAKE SUBDIVISION AND THE HOMEOWNERS.THERE WOULD BE A CONSIDERATION ALSO WITH THE NEW STORMWATER REQUIREMENTS AND, AND, AND ALL.
I CAN TELL YOU RIGHT THERE, THAT AREA RIGHT THERE STAYS UNDERWATER EVERY TIME IT RAINS.
I DON'T THINK YOU COULD FIX THAT PROBLEM WITHOUT PUSHING THAT WATER INTO THAT TRIBUTARY AND THEN CREATING AN ISSUE SOUTH OF THERE, UH, TOWARD THE OTHER PART OF MEADOW LAKE AND THE COUNTRY CLUB.
IT JUST APPEARS TO ME THAT A FIX IN THE EVENTUALITY OF THIS HAPPENING WOULD BE TO ASK FOR, UH, YOU KNOW, A CHANGE IN THE ORDINANCE OR A VARIANCE TO THE ORDINANCE IN THIS AREA TO, TO MOVE THIS UP CLOSER TO FRANKLIN ROAD.
UM, AND, AND THAT WAY IT DOESN'T GET INTO THE IMPACT THAT AREA.
I'D JUST LIKE TO GET IT ON THE RECORD SAYING IT.
UH, DO WE HAVE A, ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT ON THIS MATTER? OKAY.
DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MASTER PLAN AS PRESENTED AND SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS IN THE STAFF REPORT? YES.
I NEED TO RECUSE MYSELF BECAUSE I HAVE ATTENDED THE BRENTWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH.
WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE FROM COMMISSIONER TUCCI.
WE HAVE A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER KAPLAN.
UM, IS THERE A DISCUSSION COMMISSIONER CHURCH, WE'LL START WITH YOU.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? NO, THAT WAS IT.
COMMISSIONER PIPPEN? NO, COMMISSIONER.
THE DISCUSSION THAT WE JUST HAD, THEY HAVE TO COME BACK TO US AGAIN FOR THE ADDITIONAL LOT LAYOUT FOR THE, IF, IF THEY PARKING LOT LAYOUT RIGHT.
IF IT'S NEEDED, IF THEY WERE TO BUILD THAT SOUTHERN PORTION, THEY WOULD HAVE TO SUBMIT A SITE PLAN THAT WOULD COME BACK TO THE COMMISSION FOR THE, THE FINAL, SORT OF THE FINAL SITE PLAN FOR THAT.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? YEAH, AND, AND AT THAT TIME, IF, IF THEY ASKED TO, OR IF THE CITY DETERMINED THEY NEEDED THE PARKING, THEN THERE WOULD'VE TO BE A WHOLE LOT OF WORK DONE, ESPECIALLY IN THAT AREA THAT I KNOW SITS IN LOW WATER JUST TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS THAT THE CITY HAS.
FULL, FULL, FULL, UH, SITE AND GRADING PLAN ALONG WITH ALL THE CURRENT STORM WATER, UH, VOLUME AND STORM WATER QUALITY, UH, REQUIREMENTS.
AND ALSO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF, UH, FLOOD, FLOOD WAY THROUGH THERE, UH, FLOOD ELEVATIONS AND STREAM BUFFERS.
OPPOSED? ABSTAINING ONE ABSTENTION MR. STAT, THE MASTER PLAN IS ACCEPTED.
[2. BPC2310-006 Revised Site Plan - Brentwood United Methodist, 309 Franklin Road, Zoning SI-1 - Applicant: Ragan Smith Associates]
TO THE SECOND ITEM.THE REVISED SITE PLAN FOR BRENTWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH.
UH, REAGAN SMITH ASSOCIATES REQUEST APPROVAL OF A REVISED SITE PLAN FOR BRENTWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH.
THE PROPOSAL SHOWS TWO SMALLER ADDITIONS TOTALING 10,629 SQUARE FEET.
NO SUBSTANTIAL ADDITION OF ONSITE PARKING IS NEEDED OR IS BEING PROPOSED.
ONE ACCESS TO WILLIAMSBURG ROAD IS BEING ELIMINATED.
THE ADDITION OF 10 PARKING SPACES IS ALSO PROPOSED.
THE FUTURE RESERVE PARKING ON THE CLEMENT PROPERTY IS STILL INCLUDED IN THE MASTER PLAN AND IS IN INCORPORATED INTO THE PARKING CALCULATIONS.
HOWEVER, THAT'S NOT PART OF THIS FINAL SITE PLAN.
THE SITE PLAN, UM, AS WAS PREVIOUSLY PROPOSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION, UM, THIS PARKING WILL NOT BE BUILT UNTIL THE CITY FINDS IT NECESSARY.
THE ADDITION, THE ADDITIONS WILL BE BRICK VENEER WITH SHINGLE ROOF TO MATCH THE EXISTING CHURCH.
AND THERE IS ONE CONDITION OF APPROVAL, WHICH IS THE STORMWATER DETENTION AND WATER QUALITY WILL BE REQUIRED, UM, WITH THAT STAFF REQUEST THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION VOTE TO APPROVE THE REVISED SITE PLAN SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STAFF REPORT.
AND THESE ARE SOME IMAGES OF WHAT THE PROPOSED ADDITIONS, UH, WILL LOOK LIKE.
AND THE APPLICANT IS HERE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ON THIS AS WELL.
I I DO HAVE A QUESTION IF THE APPLICANT COMES UP, SO I'M LOOKING AT THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND IF, AND I DON'T KNOW IF THIS, IF THIS IS THE SAME COPY AS AS UP THERE, BUT THEY'RE REQUIRED RIGHT NOW
[00:15:01]
TO HAVE 977 AND THEY HAVE 973 AND THEN THEY'RE ADDING 10,000 FEET OR 10.IS THAT, I MEAN, THE PARK, THE PARKING ON THIS PLAN IS PRETTY COMPLICATED.
UM, THE, THERE'S SOME ON ONSITE PARKING AND THERE'S OFFSITE PARKING RIGHT.
WITH THE, AT THE REGIONS BANK AND MULTIPLE OTHER LOCATIONS IN THE SURROUNDING AREA.
BUT, UH, THE WAY I UNDERSTAND IT, THEY HAVE 973 TOTAL CLAIMED PARKING SPACES WITH THAT OFFSITE AND ON-SITE PARKING COMBINED.
BUT THE, THE, THEY'RE REWORKING SOME OF THE, IN THE ONSITES AREAS THAT INCREASE THAT HAVE, SO THEY HAVE A NET GAIN OF 10 NEW SPACES RIGHT ON SITE ON THE NORTHERN PART PORTION OF THE SITE.
BUT IT LOOKS LIKE THAT THEY NEED TO ADD THAT THE PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS ADD 62
NO, BUT I MEAN THE REQUIREMENT UNDER PROPOSED, UH, PARKING REQUIREMENT SO THAT THE RIGHT HAND TOP BOX, UM, IT JUST SAYS EXISTING ADD IN TOTAL.
UH, IS THAT TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING? IT SAYS 9 77 EXISTING ADDING, THEY'RE ADDING 62 TO THE REQUIREMENT OR THE REQUIREMENT.
AND SO THEN WHERE ARE THOSE, I KNOW YOU'RE ADDING 10 ON THE PLANT, SO WHERE ARE THE OTHER ONES GONNA COME FROM? SO IN COMBINATION WITH THE 1 52 FROM THE CLEMENT PROPERTY AND THEN WE HAVE OFFSITE AGREEMENTS WITH, IF YOU CAN, WELL, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU HAVE A GOOD, A GOOD VIEW, BUT ACROSS THE STREET, THE SYNERGY CENTER.
JUST SO YOU'RE GONNA GET MORE PARKING FROM THOSE SITES.
THEY CURRENTLY HAVE THOSE AGREEMENTS AND WE'RE ALLOWED TO CLAIM UP TO LIKE 20%.
ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I'M ON MR. KAPLAN.
ARE THERE ANY, IS THERE ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS? RIGHT.
DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE REVISED SITE PLAN SUBJECT TO THE CONDITION OF THE STAFF REPORT MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER BAIN? DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER PIPPEN? IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? OKAY.
ALL IN FAVOR OF THE REVISED SITE PLAN.
SO THE MOTION PASSES, UM, WITH AN ABSTENTION FROM COMMISSIONER STADNIK.
ONTO THE MOST CONTROVERSIAL ITEM ON THE AGENDA TONIGHT.
[1. Approval of the 2024 Schedule of Meetings for the Planning Commission]
APPROVAL OF THE 2024 SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION.I MEAN YOU WANNA WATCH THIS
AND THIS IS THE SCHEDULE PROPOSED FOR NEXT YEAR'S MEETINGS.
AND, UH, APRIL 1ST WE DIDN'T ADJUST THE, UH, NOVEMBER, 2024 BRIEFING DATE.
WE MOVED THAT TO TUESDAY INSTEAD OF WEDNESDAY.
THE TO, SINCE MANY PEOPLE INDICATED THEY MIGHT NOT, UH, BE AVAILABLE DUE TO THANKSGIVING.
SO WE DID ADJUST THAT SINCE LAST THURSDAY.
AND WITH THAT, I WOULD ASK THAT YOU ADOPT THE SCHEDULE.
UM, THERE WAS SOME DISCUSSION ABOUT THE JANUARY 2ND DATE FOR, UH, THIS, UH, FOR TWO MONTHS FROM NOW.
UM, AND COMMISSIONER CHURCH WILL BE ABSENT.
COMMISSIONER KAPLAN WILL MOST LIKELY BE ABSENT.
IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE THAT HAS DIFFICULTY WITH THAT? OKAY, WAS THAT SOMETHING? I DON'T KNOW.
I MEAN YOU JUST STAND YOUR OH NO, YEAH, YOU, YOUR ALMOST HALFWAY UP.
UM, ALRIGHT, WE HAVE A MOTION TO ADOPT THE 2024 MEETING SCHEDULE AS PRESENT APPROVE MOTION FOR APPROVAL.
SECOND FOR COMMISSIONER STANEK.
ANY DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR? AYE.
EVAN, YOU WANT COPY? I'VE GOT ONE.
DOES THAT HELP YOU? THANK YOU.
IT'S EXCITING THAT HE WANTS TO COME BACK TO OUR MEETINGS.
POSITIVE, POSITIVE SIGNS FOR THE CITY.
[2. Monthly Security Report - October 2023]
THE MONTHLY SECURITY REPORT.UM, AND ONTO THE SECURITY REPORT.
AS YOU CAN SEE THAT IT WAS DU THE AMOUNT, TOTAL AMOUNT WAS REDUCED BY ABOUT 1.5 MILLION.
THERE WERE SEVERAL, UH, UH, BONDS RE UH, THAT WERE REDUCED AND RELEASED, UH, THIS MONTH.
AND WITH THAT, I WOULD ASK THAT YOU ADOPT THE SECURITY REPORT.
DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE SECURITY REPORT? SO MOVED.
WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER CHURCH, A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER PIP.
WE WILL ACCEPT YOUR SECURITY REPORT.
DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD FROM
[00:20:01]
ANY OF THE COMMITTEES OR FROM THE CITY COMMISSION OR ANYTHING? OKAY.NO OTHER NEW BUSINESS? OH, FROM THE MR. BANK HISTORIC COMMISSION, UH, WE'RE DOING SOME, SOME WATER REMEDIATION TO THE RAVENSWOOD PLACE IN THE BACK DOOR.
THERE HAD BEEN SOME, SOME WATER GET IN THERE.
SO THEY'RE PUTTING A, A, A LITTLE ROOF AREA OVER THAT TO COVER IT.
AND THEN RESTORING THE, THE DOORFRAME AND STUFF.
WE'VE REPLACED SOME WINDOWS IN THE BOILING SPRINGS ACADEMY AND LOOKING AT OPTIONS FOR REPLACING, UH, A NEW REPLACEMENT OF THE BRENT VALE CABIN DOWN IN CROCKETT PARK.
I HAVE A QUESTION FOR PRESTON.
THERE'S A STACK STONE WALL ON JOHNSON CHAPEL ROAD.
DO WE KNOW IF THAT'S PART OF, IF THAT'S A HISTORICAL SITE OR NOT? IT KEEPS GETTING KNOCKED DOWN 'CAUSE THERE'S A CURVE THERE THAT PEOPLE ARE MISSING, MISSING
I'LL, I'LL HAVE TO LOOK AND SEE WHERE IT IS ON THE MAP, BUT OKAY.
IT'D BE THAT, IT'D BE THAT, THAT, THAT CURVE THAT'S BEHIND.
YEAH, I'M QUITE SURE THAT'S ON PRIVATE PROPERTY.
WE'VE SPOKEN TO THE OWNER AND HE SAID THAT HE'S HAD TO REPLACE THE WALL A FEW TIMES IN THE PAST AND, UH, IN FACT WE COMPLETED A LITTLE, UM, STUDY ON JOHNSON CHAPEL ROAD AND IT WAS ADDRESSED WITH THE COMMISSION.
SO THAT'S WHERE WE ARE WITH THAT.
BUT I'M QUITE SURE IT'S ON PRIVATE PROPERTY, WHETHER OR NOT IT'S ACTUALLY A HISTORICAL WALL.
I'M NOT SURE, BUT YEAH, I JUST, IT LOOKS LIKE IT, BUT YEAH, WASN'T SURE.
THERE WAS A, THERE WAS A SERIOUS ACCIDENT THERE HERE A COUPLE WEEKS AGO LETTING, LETTING TWO SMALL CHILDREN RENT AND TOOK A TREE AND THE SECTION OF THAT WALL.
THEY WEREN'T HURT, BUT YEAH, I'LL LOOK INTO IT.
I JUST DIDN'T KNOW IF IT WAS PART OF SOMETHING THAT WE SHOULD BE CONCERNED ABOUT.
ANY OTHER BUSINESS? THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER.
IF NOT THEM WITHOUT OBJECTION.